10mm Ruger Super Redhawk

[Duck Lips]

What's your thoughts on the new Ruger Super Red Hawk in 10mm ?
Do you think there will be a calling for this or is this going to be a bust?

http://www.ruger.com/products/superRedhawkStandard/specSheets/5524.html

 

[jdav]

I would be a buyer! Had no idea this was in the works.

 

[MuleShoe]

I WOULD LIKE ONE AS WELL ! BE A LOT EASIER ON KEEPING UP WITH BRASS FOR RELOADING !

 

[D_Max]

Its to big to carry for edc and if the other options are 45 lc or 44 mag im pretty sure I would buy the 44 mag . IMO

 

[Hayata]

Oh dang!

 

[Horsehat]

I am a 10 mm fan, but also a .41 mag fan. In a revolver the .41 is a near ballistic twin and easier to load (no moon clips). If I were not already loading the .41 ammo I would buy one.

 

[fastfish66]

I am a 10 mm fan, but also a .41 mag fan. In a revolver the .41 is a near ballistic twin and easier to load (no moon clips). If I were not already loading the .41 ammo I would buy one.

RATHER HAVE THE 41 MAG

 

[Leveraction44]

I hope it does well. Maybe the price of 10mm ammo will come down a little. But really!!! In a 6 shot revolver what is the point. That same revolver can be had in an 7 or 8 shot 357 mag or 44 mag, or 454. I can take my G20 and have 16 rounds of 10mm for the woods.

 

[greg vess]

On that big of frame I would go 44 mag since it's not going to be small enough to carry. On the downside the 44 mag rounds are through the rood on cost. 10 mm aren't cheap either.

 

[MaconGuns]

Whats a 10mm do that a 44 mag cant? Is it tapped for 2 extra rounds? Id rather take the cash and built a 10mm sbr or just buy a 10mm Glock and slap an extended barrel on it. Other than a collection piece it seems pointless.