- Joined
- Jan 25, 2017
- Messages
- 897
- Reaction score
- 264
Just gonna leave this right here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be a Federal judge though. U.S. circuit court judges hear NFA cases.This seems like a really easy case to beat IF you got a judge that can read English and has ANY understanding of what the NFA laws clearly say.
Government agencies particularly the ATF, FBI, FDA, CIA, NSA look at the Constitution as a stumbling block for them that needs to be circumvented, not a guarantee of our individual rights.
interesting..But IF (and I say "if" ) the National Firearms Act and the 1986 act of Congress that banned civilian machineguns made after 1986 were legal and constitutional exercises of federal power,
THEN... is ATF really wrong to say that if a machine forces your finger to smash itself against the trigger faster than you can make any voluntary muscle movements, so you're not actually "pulling" the trigger through a different muscle contraction than what fired the first shot, but you get a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th shot anyway.... this is a machinegun?
Is it wrong to say that if you grab a gun, cock it, and use your finger muscles to just pull the trigger back once and (from your perspective) hold it back, and the gun empties the magazine at a rate of 500 rounds/ minute, that it's firing "more than one shot per single function of the trigger?"
I'd like to argue YES, it's wrong, because the law talks about the TRIGGER, not about the man's FINGER.
The finger thinks it's a machinegun, but the trigger think's it's just a semi-auto being very rapidly pulled over and over.