could it b? suppressors coming off NFA list

[spencer60]

Wouldn't bet on it right now, the gov't isn't fond of giving up taxable income, that $200 tax stamp was set back when most people didn't bring home $200 in 6 months

The $200 stamp is a drop in the bucket. That revenue isn't important, is it was they'd be requiring suppressors and automating the process so you got one in an hour. They make a couple of hundred million on tax stamps... probably not even the NFA division's budget.

This is politics, and if the political stars align this will go through while everyone is looking at the SC nomination or the first brick laid in the Mexican wall.

My only real concern is that the NRA will push the whole national reciprocity fiasco over this. That will NEVER pass and the political capital it loses will be the end of any pro-gun push the Trumps try to get through.

 

[paliknight]

This is still not as ridiculous as the tax stamp on SBRs.

 

[spencer60]

True... going through all that to regulate a gun that is provably less 'deadly' (or at least has less terminal energy) than what you can buy in the store makes no sense at all.

 

[devildogexpert]

Please paypal $20 for your new bridge to youmustbegullible@belivinganychangehappenswith.gov

So shipping is free, or you deliver? Just asking, just got rid of my truck. Let me know, thanks.

Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

 

[JDS556762]

How about I'm always scared when I'm asking the federal government permission to do something. I think we should all pay attention to quid pro quo of this agreement. The gov has a funny way of always getting something from every agreement. I can't help but feel like I'm making a deal with the devil on this one....just don't know....

 

[BangBang]

Thanks

Here's the video from last nights channel 7 news cast. It kept pausing with me for some reason, so I had to keep hitting the play button every 30 seconds or so. Very annoying!

http://wspa.com/2017/01/11/upstate-congressman-aims-to-ease-gun-suppressor-restrictions/