Will someone please explain the technical reason that carrying a chambered 1911 with the hammer down is dangerous?
Because prior to Series 80's, if the weapon were to be dropped, especially hitting muzzle first, it could potentially fire.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will someone please explain the technical reason that carrying a chambered 1911 with the hammer down is dangerous?
I got that from the others, but what is it technically that makes it so dangerous. Dropping is not technical, it is an accident. I am not that familiar with the technicals of the 1911 and am curious what makes it dangerous to when the hammer is down.Because prior to Series 80's, if the weapon were to be dropped, especially hitting muzzle first, it could potentially fire.
I got that from the others, but what is it technically that makes it so dangerous. Dropping is not technical, it is an accident. I am not that familiar with the technicals of the 1911 and am curious what makes it dangerous to when the hammer is down.
I'm genuinely curious of the mindset behind having the gun at half cock? Instead of a condition 3 where you have the entire slide to cycle, you're chasing a small hammer to be cocked back.. thus making it harder to get the pistol into action. On top of that, you've got the accident in waiting by releasing the hammer with the trigger and trying to stop the firearm's proper cycle of operation as opposed to a proper decocker.
And for common knowledge, the half cock position is to keep the gun from going full-auto in the event of a sear/hammer engagement failing.
I know very little about 1911's but I have handled them, so what would be the problem with NOT carrying the gun with the hammer cocked? I mean, wouldn't that just make the first trigger pull a bit longer? Do you guys seriously think your life hangs on that fine of a balance where you wold lose your life because you didn't have the hammer already cocked back yet you had to disengage a safety? Forgive me for saying so, but that makes absolutely no sense.
I know very little about 1911's but I have handled them, so what would be the problem with NOT carrying the gun with the hammer cocked? I mean, wouldn't that just make the first trigger pull a bit longer? Do you guys seriously think your life hangs on that fine of a balance where you wold lose your life because you didn't have the hammer already cocked back yet you had to disengage a safety? Forgive me for saying so, but that makes absolutely no sense.
The half cock locks the hammer and trigger. Its not that hard to get it in action if you practice. I must have decocked the 1911 1,000 times. Never had a problem.
1911s are single action pistols. There is no cocking of the hammer by pulling the trigger. The simple, single action results in a short travel that can be tuned to be very nice.
But what are the advantages or reasons for doing so? You have two manual safeties already that lock the slide, sear and trigger.
I don't buy the it's safer argument. You are relying on a little shelf on the hammer that was not meant to be used as being described. In addition, you are in essence firing the gun with your finger in the way to decock it. Even if you had a Series 80 gun, pulling the trigger deactivates the firing pin safety... which results in a bang if you slip.