Ohh. I agree but you know the fun police will be along to crush our dreams.No different than someone illegally converting a mechanical trigger imo. Same crime. Same penalty.
Electronic vs mechanical should make no difference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ohh. I agree but you know the fun police will be along to crush our dreams.No different than someone illegally converting a mechanical trigger imo. Same crime. Same penalty.
Electronic vs mechanical should make no difference.
No different than someone illegally converting a mechanical trigger imo. Same crime. Same penalty.
Electronic vs mechanical should make no difference.
Yes. The NFA says somewhere "readily convertible". What makes an Ar not "readily convertible" is the lack of a disconnector. If you were to set this up to use the incorporated timer designed to regulate bolt carrier float as a disconnector. Well there you have it. I don't like the way they do things but my opinions don't keep me out of prison. Abiding the law until it can be made to be more in line with my opinions does. Hopefully though they thought of that. I would probably be more on board if they had nixed the whole release fire altogether. You should be able to get plenty of fire from a 1lb trigger without that fearure. Someone could still monkey with it but they would have to design and add a circuit. Maybe passing the "readily convertible" test.That's true, except the ATF is old school. If you can reprogram a part (or have someone in China do it for you) and make a semi into a full-auto, they will look at it as 'easier' to modify than having to do machining on the lower or something. That's probably even true.
ATF PUT NO MORE ON STASE 3 HELL FIREI was reading about this trigger the other day.
The pull/release fire mode looks pretty cool.
Since it's digital, I wonder how long it'll take for somebody to figure out how to reprogram it to run full auto.