-
If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.
Does Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) scare you?
- Thread starter Stampede
- Start date
They'll harness it to take scamming people, to a whole new level.
I haven’t read the 4 pages but my answer is…..
Skynet….
Just skynet….
That is all ….
Skynet….
Just skynet….
That is all ….
It's artificial why would it scare me?
But hey if it launches all the nukes one day and reboots this planet then I'm all for it
But hey if it launches all the nukes one day and reboots this planet then I'm all for it
Doesn't bother me at all... What they call "AI" today is really just a big database (data 'lakes') used to generate answers to questions it's stored over time.
It sounds smart because we're used to pitiful 'AI' like Siri or Alexa, but it's really just like training a dog.
The "I" in "AI" stands for intelligence, which is impossible to have without some level of self-awareness. That can never happen with digital computers.
My guess is we'll see real AI when quantum computers get up to around the same level of quantum bits (q-bits) in the human brain.
There's a lot of evidence that quantum effects are the basis for self-awareness and there's got to be a minimum number q-bits needed, although I doubt anyone knows what the number actually would be.
It's for sure not what our simple (433 q-bits is the largest so far) quantum systems are capable of today.
The danger of 'AI' is simply the same as what we've had since things started getting automated during the industrial revolution. Computers do exactly what you tell them to do... and humans screw up.
It sounds smart because we're used to pitiful 'AI' like Siri or Alexa, but it's really just like training a dog.
The "I" in "AI" stands for intelligence, which is impossible to have without some level of self-awareness. That can never happen with digital computers.
My guess is we'll see real AI when quantum computers get up to around the same level of quantum bits (q-bits) in the human brain.
There's a lot of evidence that quantum effects are the basis for self-awareness and there's got to be a minimum number q-bits needed, although I doubt anyone knows what the number actually would be.
It's for sure not what our simple (433 q-bits is the largest so far) quantum systems are capable of today.
The danger of 'AI' is simply the same as what we've had since things started getting automated during the industrial revolution. Computers do exactly what you tell them to do... and humans screw up.
Yep, just the new buzzword. Nothing intelligent or self aware about it.
The results of massive data mining.
Can't we just unplug it? No power no worky
Yes
