Glock fanboys cannot get over losing to SIG!

[timbgtm]

I personally wish neither had won and it'd went to an American owned company.

That being said, I think the P320 met the requirements better than Glock so the win is understandable.

I feel the same way, our military should be using American made and manufactured ,owned weapons.

 

[handloader]

Perhaps what is best in a police officers holster that qualifies once a year, or a person that shoots competition every weekend, is different from what is best suited to a g.i. Sort of like my truck vs your Mustang, are you hauling ladders or hauling yourself? Different tools for different jobs.

 

[palmettomoon]

 

[JustinR]

$100M is why they didn't get the contract.

 

[Wudee]

Could it be that Sig made a superior handgun that met the requirements requested by the Military? Glock obviously did not...

 

[palmettomoon]

Could it be that Sig made a superior handgun that met the requirements requested by the Military? Glock obviously did not...

 

[Joab]

Not a fan boy here but if you look at the final numbers it came down to $$$$$

 

[NewLeaf]

The thing about fans is, you can always switch teams. Glock fans can become Sig fans at the drop of a hat if vicarious victories are really that important to them.

Hope it's alright if I LIKE'EM ALL

 

[spencer60]

SIG bid lower... Plain and simple.

They were both able to pass the testing, and SIG gave them a lower bid. I think they also got a better pistol to boot, but it's about the money.

 

[MaconGuns]

Glock lost because Sig built what they wanted.
Even though the may have cheated a little.