Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
#273
so what conclusions have we come to so far.
The NIST report claim no structural damage contributed to the collapse. It claims office fires alone are what caused the structural failure and collapse.
I haven't read the whole NIST report. IF that is what the report says then in my opinion it is wrong.
I know from my own experience with explosives that seismic events can do damage to buildings. I do not recall doing any damage to any buildings myself but I know that it does happen. The company had our own seismograph to measure what we did and we used another company to monitor our work as well.
Appreciate you taking the time to provide an informed opinion. The horror of the scene that day plus armchair demo expert theories (myself included) do not necessarily equal reality.
6bz
A bunch of terrorist from Saudi Arabia, but we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq instead, and do massive arms deals with Saudi because they play ball with our Petro dollar. And now there's a Saudi Statue at ground zero that says there's no other god but Allah.A bunch of terrorists took us by surprise by exploiting somewhat lax screening processes and took over a few planes and slammed them into buildings. The end.
Well you have the governments claims, then you have the conspiracy theorist claims, then you have a host of ideas from ODT members. I'm a student of them allThe Govt can make whatever stupid claim they like. The conspiracy theorists can as well.
Given the size of the two towers and that they collapsed from the top on down, in your experience, what kind of measurement do you think you would realistically get for seismic activity if you were standing across the street? What's that, 40 yards?
Manhattan is built on solid bedrock, does that make the transfer of such energy better, or worse?
Conspiracy theorists be like the Illuminati has everything to do with it. Just for memes.