• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Handgun at 18??

In a legal stand point it is. Stop trying to be mister play on words. Your level of troll isn't good enough. Good try though.
Let me try help you out, and lay out the "legal stand point"with which you claim to so familiar.

NO statute in the United States says a vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO court decision at either the state or federal level says that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO legal journal or published article says that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO attorney in any proceeding has ever said that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

So from a "legal point" the concept does not exist.

Feel free to provide any citations to which you are privy that make it a "legal point"

The so called "legal maxim" that "your vehicle is an extension of your home" is purely a creation of keyboard cowboys, who keep repeating among themselves as though it is revealed truth.
 
Let me try help you out, and lay out the "legal stand point"with which you claim to so familiar.

NO statute in the United States says a vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO court decision at either the state or federal level says that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO legal journal or published article says that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

NO attorney in any proceeding has ever said that your vehicle is an extension of your home.

So from a "legal point" the concept does not exist.

Feel free to provide any citations to which you are privy that make it a "legal point"

The so called "legal maxim" that "your vehicle is an extension of your home" is purely a creation of keyboard cowboys, who keep repeating among themselves as though it is revealed truth.
Here is a tid bit from a legal advisor website, while it's not a state statute quote, many would believe when written by lawyers it's close enough to legal sense just layman's terms. How about taking you condescending self and stop being a keyboard cowboys as you called it. I bet you feel real good spouting "iT iSn'T iN tHe LaW" may not be spelled out anyone with any sense can understand despite that it still isn't far off at all.

First , what can you do without a weapons license? In Georgia, you can purchase a firearm, transport it in your car, and keep it inside your home and business without a license. While the law previously stated that a gun must be kept in the trunk or enclosed glove box or closed console of your car, that law has been relaxed over recent legislative periods. You can now treat your car as an extension of your house and business and keep the loaded firearm anywhere in the vehicle.

By your logic as long as it's not spelled flat out by daddy government it isn't true. Speaking in layman's terms it in fact is an extension of your home because of the stand your ground law and castle doctrine.

Georgia law in defining Castle Doctrine rights does not use the term “home” or “house;” the term employed is “habitation.” A habitation is defined by Ga. Code Ann. § 16-3-24.1 as “any dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business…”

If you are the victim of unlawful force or deadly force when you are in your dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, these places are your castle, and the law will protect you in the use of deadly force. In these Castle Doctrine circumstances, the law will justify the use of force or even deadly force based upon a person’s reasonable belief that force or deadly force was necessary to defend against force inside his or her habitation.
 
"speaking in layman terms" Travis and Greg McMichael made a perfectly legal citizens arrest (and in layman's term acted in self defense). Ask them how that's work out for them.

You can get passed out drunk in your house, and nothing the police can do about that. Try doing that in your automobile, because as all laymen know, it's an extension of your home.

There are many documented cases of persons under the age of 16 using firearms in defense of their home. So in layman's term, they can do that in an THEIR automobile, because it's just an extension of their home.

In "layman's term" a magazine is a clip.

"Your automobile is an extension of your home" is not the law, has never been the law, and keeping on repeating it on the internet is not going to make it the law, no matter what sort of mish mash you pull out of other statutes to try to make it so.
 
If "your car is an extension of your home" isn't accurate enough,
how about:

"When it comes to Georgia's gun laws, your car is treated like your home."?
Is that better?

Context is everything. Specific words and phrases that are well-known to have a certain meaning in one field of law may not have any recognized meaning in some other aspect of the law-- it could be all up in the air.

Remember back when we were sure that "private property" didn't mean government-owned land and buildings that were owned by a City or County but had been leased to a private business entity?
Well, now all the appellate courts in Georgia have created a "gun control law exception" for the English language when it comes to what private property really is. ( the Atlanta Botanical Gardens case is what I'm speaking of).
 
"speaking in layman terms" Travis and Greg McMichael made a perfectly legal citizens arrest (and in layman's term acted in self defense). Ask them how that's work out for them.

You can get passed out drunk in your house, and nothing the police can do about that. Try doing that in your automobile, because as all laymen know, it's an extension of your home.

There are many documented cases of persons under the age of 16 using firearms in defense of their home. So in layman's term, they can do that in an THEIR automobile, because it's just an extension of their home.

In "layman's term" a magazine is a clip.

"Your automobile is an extension of your home" is not the law, has never been the law, and keeping on repeating it on the internet is not going to make it the law, no matter what sort of mish mash you pull out of other statutes to try to make it so.
  1. No they didn't, I don't know ow a single person who believes they acted within the law.
  2. Last time I checked the castle doctrine doesn't apply to alcohol consumption or DUI laws.
  3. The way the law is written you have to be 18 to possess a handgun, although using deadly force in self defense a lesser charge of possession by minor is unlikely.
  4. No, just dumbass terms
NObody here care for your play on words or arrogance. We get it you're trying your hardest to be right. Just because it isn't spelled out directly by daddy government in their laws doesn't mean it can be read or inferred. Or is that to hard of a concept?
 
If "your car is an extension of your home" isn't accurate enough,
how about:

"When it comes to Georgia's gun laws, your car is treated like your home."?
Is that better?

Context is everything. Specific words and phrases that are well-known to have a certain meaning in one field of law may not have any recognized meaning in some other aspect of the law-- it could be all up in the air.

Remember back when we were sure that "private property" didn't mean government-owned land and buildings that were owned by a City or County but had been leased to a private business entity?
Well, now all the appellate courts in Georgia have created a "gun control law exception" for the English language when it comes to what private property really is. ( the Atlanta Botanical Gardens case is what I'm speaking of).
Yep. how many REAL lawyers can give a cogent explanation of what a "usufruct" is? My spell check doesn't even know.

How about, "Although no statute, court decision, or judge has ever said so, and because the real laws have too many words, one could say, '"When it comes to Georgia's gun laws, your car is treated like your home."? ' and "At least until you have had one drink too many while carrying a concealed weapon, then in layman's terms you're ****ed.."
 
Y04petergriffin.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom