We all know that the police are not there to prevent crime. I believe in 2005 the court even said they have no constitutional mandate to protect. It is on individuals to protect and secure themselves and their property. If they make the financial decision to incrementally increase their security that is on them. I personally am not happy about the hundreds of gun that the multiple burglaries have put on the street. Is there any moral culpability?
So the police are there to arrest or maybe even shoot the property owner after the property owner has to use lethal for to protect his family or property?
So the courts are there to make sure the law abiding citizen pays for an attorney or face jail time through a kangaroo court appeasing the Liberals?