I'll go ahead and post this. Cops arrest guy with camera phone & kill his dog

[Omega]

The Constitution disagrees with you.

Apparently, those are simply guidelines to everyone on here! They support anything that amends the original wording and the bull**** articles added to it. I strictly believe in the first 14. No articles or admended parts. If you want to tell a cop to go **** his mother try that in this free country. Talk about deception... Whats funny is I have to argue freedom with some, when they cant even comprehend true freedom!This pig in the video was a pure dick doing nothing but flexing a badge. ACAB!

 

[Omega]

Try this or anything even remotely violent on a k-9 unit and see what happens.

 

[BIKER13]

Please give this one enough rope,Please do.This thread needs to end.

 

[linebacker]

Please give this one enough rope,Please do.This thread needs to end.

^ agree

 

[BIKER13]

They close a thread witha a vet talking about 2A gun rights but leave this LEO bashing bull **** up to stir the pot on the site,

 

[meastt]

Please give this one enough rope,Please do.This thread needs to end.

X3

This thing is done.

 

[Retread]

I know some will get angry at this, but:
How many people are here because they can't pass a 4473?
How many people are too young, or immature to look past traffic enforcement?
How many people here are unduly influenced by the media?
How many people here think it is cool to be "bad?"
How many people have failed so many times they think everyone is against them?

To live in condition red all the time is unhealthy.

 

[HarmsWay]

Your prerogative, of course, but I'll just stick to the original theme in this thread:

You claim the situation could have been handled differently, and I agree; the aggressor in this case could have secured his dog properly and prevented this entire occurrence.

Yes, I know what you meant to say was: The officers could have used less than lethal force, but, unfortunately, an officer was put in a position of defending his life, due to to the lack of foresight and the decisions of the dog's owner. Now, if you remove emotion and the subsequent result of this situation, it is just another lethal force on force encounter that is discussed here regularly. A potentially lethal threat became apparent during this altercation with the result of lethal force being used to stop it.

While a taser or pepper spray may have also been plausible, you just don't get to make that call because you weren't the one trying to immediately react to said lethal threat..... Had the instigator secured his dog, or, chosen a better time/place to make his stand against LEOs, this might have been avoided, but so many are so quick to judge what any one of us might have done in a similar situation, but blame "evil law enforcement" to make it all feel better.

No no and no. If the douche bag cops would leave people the **** alone and stop messing with people for no reason then this would not have happened. All they had to do is let the owner go and it would have been solved. Its so hard to figure that out though.

 

[Echo 1]

 

[Mtber1172]

The Constitution disagrees with you.

Yell out "bomb" on an airplane and see where that gets you. You should probably study constitutional law before you go typing on a keyboard next time.