Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
absolutely... this!...the more holes the less blood stays in the perp!simple, there would have been fatalities if 20 shots of 9mm hit.
more hits = more chances of kills, even if with a .22lr
It was FMJ
I carry a .357 for 4 legged critters and a 9 mm for 2 legged critters.
LOL...explain to ME how your 6 shot .357 is "more effective" than my 13 shot .45 ACP..Let's see -
Trained shooter (two actually)
Multiple assailants
Point blank range, no fatalities, EVERYBODY ends up shot.
So this would have been worse how, if the good guy had a 6 shot .357 revolver?
Waiting
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/of...g-2-attempted-robbers-officials-say/825109982
THUGS IN THE YARDThey should have used an RPG, that’s the only caliber better than .357
Glad you asked.
Everyone sloughs off into a caliber debate.
Supposedly 30 shot semi-autos have made the revolver obsolete, supposedly because of the possibility of encountering "multiple thugs intent on doing harm" I believe is how one poster put it.
So rather than speculating on "what if" scenarios, here is a real life situation, where
(a) you have a pistol marksman who has been certifiably trained to a minimum level of competence in accuracy and gun handling,
(b) Who encounters multiple bad guys at point blank range
(c) Is only able to hit one of the perps, despite having 40 rounds or so at his disposal, he is able to only inconvenience the bad guy.
and
(d) ends up getting shot hisself.
So my question is, which no one has addressed, is how the good guy would have been worse off if he were carrying a 6 shot revolver.
Uhhh...you forgot to load it bruh.THUGS IN THE YARDView attachment 1768516
Uhhh... It was just launched bruh..Uhhh...you forgot to load it bruh.