Yes, I know what the deed states as far as the owner, it’s the same deed that’s been there since I moved in, dated 1989 I think. I guess my question relates more to the “subdivision recreation area” designation.
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
UPDATE: Land ownership/deed question
- Thread starter Swab
- Start date
Only way to solve may be court..
Or trespass and make them prove ownership
Or trespass and make them prove ownership
Happens all The time..
People get accustomed to lifestyle of enjoying property rights..
The ownership comes in and changes the rules now there is some dissapointment..
People get accustomed to lifestyle of enjoying property rights..
The ownership comes in and changes the rules now there is some dissapointment..
In for answers...
Agreed that the wording simply states that it is marked as "recreation area" on the plat but nothing defines that it is owned by or is actually part of the subdivision, nor does it state "for the use and enjoyment" of the subdivision lot owners. It also states "half-interest" was granted to Carter Homes, Inc., which means the "grantor", Bobby L. Carter, retained half interest. If the "inc" is also owned by the Carter family, sure looks like they summarily own 100%, unless a more recent deed states otherwise. For you to have an argument, I would think you need something in writing that states that the lot owners have an ownership interest in the property. Just my 2 cents worth. Do you have an HOA or do any covenants discuss the "recreation area"?
