They may not be same names but the guy who owns the lot and is claiming ownership of the recreation area owns the company that owns the recreation area. As the recreation area is not listed as property of the neighborhood in the form of an hoa I suppose he thinks he owns it and he may. Builders lie all the time. The new construction my wife bought in before we were married was supposed to have a nice lake and recreation area for the residents. When finished it was a retention pond completely surrounded with private property. Unless it's in writing and signed you dont have access or use. This may not be the case with this property but I haven't seen anything in the ownership records that states the land is owned and can be used by the residents of the neighborhood.
That would be a good idea if they actually owned the property, although they have claimed they purchased it, they haven’t. If you check the owner names of the small parcel (home), you’ll see they are not the same people that own the “recreation area”. At this point, I don’t believe they have the right to tell people they’re trespassing.
Further, I would think if this was presented to a court, it could be argued that the “recreation area” designation on the plat would imply that it was designated as a recreation area for the residents of the development.
I’m not claiming to have a right to use the property, but I am claiming that they don’t have a right to tell me I can’t use the property.