Yes.
The Bank guard that shot the unarmed robber twice in the back, killing him as he was retreating from the bank, was justified?
There was no reason at all for that woman to shoot that man. Well, except he didn't "Respect her Authority"
These LEO have gone wild with just shooting the first time a little adrenaline (fear/panic) starts to flow or someone doesn't obey their command.
It's not like there was a scuffle, or that the man was armed with anything.
They need to be locked up just like Joe Citizen, but with double the bail.
When Joe Citizen has to defend his life or home, he'll be lucky to have a home, family or a job, by the time that LEO and the lame judicial system have their way with him.
Leo should have to pay for their own attorney, just like Joe Citizen.
You would think that "highly trained professionals" would be held more accountable than Joe Citizen, instead they are treated with immunity.
People who are afraid of being bit by a dog, beat up, or shot at, should not be allowed to be LEO.
Just because someone doesn't have any skills, scared of dogs, gets no respect and is lazy, shouldn't automatically qualify them to be LEO.
When bad cops are accepted and defended by other cops, it make them all bad cops.
Double standards all around. Blue Brotherhood.
Everybody is held accountable, except those that hold others accountable.
