Misleading ads

[Paynefree]

geez. I just can’t let this one slide. Was all prepared to make a buy on a 10.5 upper and saw a ln ad with a maker that I really like. Begin to ask questions only to find out that the only thing on this 10.5 upper listed from the maker is the barrel. Not the handguard. Not the upper itself. Just the barrel. The misleading ad titles got me like shake and bake wrecking my dad’s boat..

Boats and Hoes Boats and Hoes

*Micdrop I’m out.

 

[Not ATF]

Definitely some misleading ads lately.
The worst is the S & W performance center revolver (not) that keeps getting re-listed endlessly.

 

[CQB27]

V
V
V

 

[Bonecollector]

In. Because I have to be

 

[TheGman]

Where is Carnac the Magnificient when we need him!


, post: 8960290, member: 40"]

V
V
V

[/QUOTE]

 

[Gunsite Grad]

Like the Sig “x-carry” which was only a regular 320 but because x-carry was on the booklet the op used it.

 

[Paynefree]

Yay. Can’t believe this got moved to the pasture.. I figured it was general discussion. Guess it’s bad for business.

 

[Gunanddoglover]

I find it hard to believe that there are misleading ad's on ODT. Say it ain't so.

 

[gh1950]

It may be just me, but I consider using stock pictures of guns borderline misleading.

IMO no picture at all is more honest than copying the a picture from the manufacturer's website.

 

[Gunsite Grad]

It may be just me, but I consider using stock pictures of guns borderline misleading.

IMO no picture at all is more honest than copying the a picture from the manufacturer's website.

Imo the ad shouldn’t be allowed to be posted without a picture of the actual item.