New 80% Lower Rules

[JDS556762]

I thought it was legal. See ATF letter below.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...istol-equipped-with-an-sb-tactical-arm-brace/

https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/...es-Stabilizing-Brace-Letter-Final-3.21.17.pdf

"Therefore, an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not re-configured for use as a shoulder stock — even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder."

Bro......come on did you even read my post

 

[Deleted member 79987]

Bro......come on did you even read my post

Oh lol... read too fast

 

[whiskerz]

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firear...rms-ammunition-firearms-verification-overviewReceivers that meet the definition of a “firearm” must have markings, including a serial number. See 27 CFR § 478.92 (Firearm manufacturers marking requirements).


My understanding from my former employer an 02/07 who had a lot of dealing with the ATF is that when you decide to sell your 80% lower it needs to be marked with manufacturer information which is outlined in the link above. Which is basically your name and address and an assigned serial number and model. While it is not in the regulations the ATF will no longer take an all letter serial number.

 

[Don231s]

*This isn't an argument against Okuma's rule change.

Nice little CYA there rainbow.

 

[JDS556762]

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firear...rms-ammunition-firearms-verification-overviewReceivers that meet the definition of a “firearm” must have markings, including a serial number. See 27 CFR § 478.92 (Firearm manufacturers marking requirements).


My understanding from my former employer an 02/07 who had a lot of dealing with the ATF is that when you decide to sell your 80% lower it needs to be marked with manufacturer information which is outlined in the link above. Which is basically your name and address and an assigned serial number and model. While it is not in the regulations the ATF will no longer take an all letter serial number.

Would love to see the writing that states “when you sell you must” in regards to private party selling seeing as that’s been the crux here
He’s correct if he was selling it as a business

 

[XSmojo]

I just want to add that I appreciate all the explatainment efforts on this topic!

Aside from the new rule, I am not sure where we landed on the background situation. I think this has legs, maybe another day or two before we reach a final impasse or a mod steps on it.

 

[payneed]

New 80% Fewer Rules

That "new" dillussional (and timed out) mod is off to a GREAT start!!!

 

[whiskerz]

Would love to see the writing that states “when you sell you must” in regards to private party selling seeing as that’s been the crux here
He’s correct if he was selling it as a business

The ATF has a history of court cases against people selling both without a license and unmarked guns. The ATF does not have a specific number of guns, nor does profit come into play. If you want to gamble on selling unmarked guns. Feel free but that is a road that can bite you.

 

[Don231s]

Feel free but that is a road that can bite you.

What does a road bite feel like?

 

[jeep78]

What does a road bite feel like?