How can you justify paying a grand for a straight blow back that doesn't suppress well? It makes no sense that people will buy EVO's or B&T pistols that cost an arm and a leg but dont offer any advantage over a highpoint carbine or a marlin camp 9
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
Paying a grand for a blow back PCC?
- Thread starter Wolf six
- Start date
Mmmmmm. Marlin Camp 9/45.
I am new to the SBR and suppressor world and trying to learn. Why are straight blow back designs bad for supressed use? What designs are better and why?
Yes please babble more on what you are talking about.
Being a big fan of the PCC I splurged and bought the TNW Aero Survival Rifle in 9mm from CG&P used for a lot less than retail.
I just can't see spending any more money on that for a PCC.
Anyone besides the HK design use an operation other than the delayed roller lock system?
I just can't see spending any more money on that for a PCC.
Anyone besides the HK design use an operation other than the delayed roller lock system?
Yeah for real! I've wanted a Camp 9 for many years.
Why does it bother you, how/what others spend their money?
I've got a PCC (pistol caliber carbine) in 9mm that is blowback. Here is what I did to make it better running both suppressed/unsuppressed and also reduce recoil. Quick info, PSA 16" upper with hybrid bolt on RRG Glock mag lower. I changed the recoil buffer to an 8oz 9mm version and added a 308 carbine recoil spring. The lock time has been increased and it also reduces the gas in the face. Runs like a champ with 147gr ammo and a TiRant45.
Folks, if it's blowback operated, only a spring and the mass of the bolt is holding it closed. They spit fire into lefty's faces at the best of times. Put a suppressor on there, and the extra back pressure may make the cases swell, even more fire come out the ejection port, or malfunctions. My guess anyway.
