Not much of a Second Amendment Founfation if they are picking and choosing when to support the 2nd amendment
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...-defend-the-presence-of-firearms-at-protests/
Thanks! Next make it unlawful for citizens to "be armed in a gathering". Wait a minute didn't we...
So I came across this post and have to respectfully push back on the comments I've read up to this point. This "opinion" piece from the Blaze was lazy journalism in my opinion. This is another example of click bait media at its finest where many misleading headlines get taken for the truth without further reading.
The context of what Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation was quoted as saying was totally misrepresented by the writer. The part in the Washington Times piece was completely left out where Gottlieb said the SAF would "...consider legal involvement" for people being arrested who were legally carrying at demonstrations. The Blaze writer failed to mention that part.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/22/gun-rights-groups-concerned-over-protestors-carryi/
The SAF is a great organization who have been involved in some of the countries most important 2A legal issues over many years. Pro Second Amendment issues don't win in court by themselves. It takes a lot of money and time to move forward our agenda and preserve our rights as gun owners. Just ask people in California and elsewhere. Many people fail or neglect to remember that at times in my opinion.