That’s the correct answer end of discussion
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you have a dog that is known to be vicious and you allow it to run around loose, should you be held responsible when it attacks and kills someone?That’s the correct answer end of discussion
Yes. End of discussion. 🤣If you have a dog that is known to be vicious and you allow it to run around loose, should you be held responsible when it attacks and kills someone?
That's racist, and a page from the old Klan playbook.True, but you don’t give the black sheep access to a weapon…
If you have a dog that is known to be vicious and you allow it to run around loose, should you be held responsible when it attacks and kills someone?
Don't disagree with any of that but the question in this scenario was should the parents be held responsible. It is not about the kid or his chances in life. In this instance my answer is yes.What the father did was wrong and he should go to jail for it but this kid didn't have a chance.
And by your argument you should be allowed to spawn worthless trash and then have no responsibility to raise them properly. If not your responsibility then who's? The Government? The (government) school system? Right and wrong is something that should be learned in the home. Not the schools.By that argument anytime your kid does something wrong you should be held accountable. Car accidents, fighting, drug charges, theft. And when does it end? When your kid is 18, 21, 40? They are charging the kid as an adult so he’s old enough to be charged as an adult, but the dad is still charged since his son is a child? Government playing both sides of the fence here.
They have the dad charged with 2nd degree murder. That’s absolutely ridiculous. Let’s keep this game going, and charge the teachers, FBI, local law enforcement, and his bullies for “driving” him to take the actions he did.