One of the controversies is that they never fully vetted the finalists.
So there was no testing performed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the controversies is that they never fully vetted the finalists.
Some testing was performed but they didn't completer the testing once they decided glock was much more expensive or the right palm got greased you be the judge. With a military that seems so often to waste money in less than intelligent ways(don't get me wrong I am not one to believe they are over funded) it seems a little smelly when they don't even complete the trial on a long awaited replacement weapon due to a few hundred million discrepancy. I don't even have a horse in this race. I don't have a particular problem with nor a preference toward either weapon. Just a curiousity as to the outcome of what should have been an unprecedented scientific torture test. Also I'd like our military to have the best all around handgun.So there was no testing performed?
If I had a 320 I planned to use for anything other than a rangetoy, I's sure as **** do my own drop testing with a primed round. There's a thread on Pistol-Forum about this issue. Sig manual even says not to carry one in the chamber :O. I would trust the official word from Sig about as much as I would trust official word from Glock.....
https://pistol-forum.com/showthread.php?27008-P320-drop-safety-quot-issues-quot
For kicks and giggles I took my EDC G26 and chambered a piece of primed brass this afternoon. I threw it all around the yard. No surprise, it didn't fire. If anybody here has a p320, it'd be easy to test. User manuals may not advocate carrying chambered, but I don't think they typically claim that their gun is not drop safe.