SIG P365 is the real deal

[Cadcom]

Cadcom how does it fit ergonomics wise, compared to the old p6 or p225?
Looks about the same size but Im sure its a lot lighter as the p6 is all metal hammer gun sub

I have a P228. It’s much closer in size to a G42 than my 228 (By a lot.) I actually use the same holster that my G42 rides in.

 

[Cadcom]

And how does it feel with regards to recoil (smaller guns have less mass to absorb it) Cadcom ?

It felt like I was shooting my P228. It just doesn’t snap back or jump around at all.

 

[3clicks_Off]

I have a P228. It’s much closer in size to a G42 than my 228 (By a lot.) I actually use the same holster that my G42 rides in.

Yeah, I see the specs now
365 is a micro vs the p6 a standard compact
basically an inch smaller on length and height.
20+ ounces lighter.

Ergonomics... does it still have the traditional Sig feel?

 

[Cadcom]

Yeah, I see the specs now
365 is a micro vs the p6 a standard compact
basically an inch smaller on length and height.
20+ ounces lighter.

Ergonomics... does it still have the traditional Sig feel?

It does not feel like my 228 or any of the classic DA/SA metal P series SIGS. The grip is smaller and easier to grab and of course it’s striker fired so the trigger just Doesn’t have the same crisp feel of a classic SIG. But, l really like this trigger. Triggger pull is nice with a clean break and reset is short and crisp as well. Very similar to an HK VP9 trigger but nicer all around if that helps.

 

[3clicks_Off]

And how does it feel with regards to recoil (smaller guns have less mass to absorb it) Cadcom ?

personally I'm not worried about recoil and I'm sure its a little snappy. 85gr no lead JHP would tame it a bit.
I wouldn't consider it as a range gun but as a backup and wouldn't shoot much after a 500 rd break in.

 

[Cadcom]

personally I'm not worried about recoil and I'm sure its a little snappy. 85gr no lead JHP would tame it a bit.
I wouldn't consider it as a range gun but as a backup and wouldn't shoot much after a 500 rd break in.

I’m not sensitive either. But I will shoot this one at the range a lot. It’s just fun to shoot. I rarely did that with my G42 or 43. Mainly due to mag capacity.

 

[3clicks_Off]

It does not feel like my 228 or any of the classic DA/SA metal P series SIGS. The grip is smaller and easier to grab and of course it’s striker fired so the trigger just Doesn’t have the same crisp feel of a classic SIG. But, l really like this trigger. Triggger pull is nice with a clean break and reset is short and crisp as well. Very similar to an HK VP9 trigger but nicer all around if that helps.

guess I just need to hit the range with one in hand and give it a go.
Worst case would be to swap it out on here to something else. They seem to move faster than a fair priced ($300) glock

 

[MRH]

Yeah, they are their own worst enemy with the way they handled the P365 and 320 issues. The only gripe I have is the 365 mags are kind of expensive. Not HK expensive but more than Glock or Smith and Wesson. But the pistol does come with 3 so that helps.

Yeah that 's good, and expensive mags are a Sig trademark for sure.

 

[3clicks_Off]

Yeah that 's good, and expensive mags are a Sig trademark for sure.

MecGar for Sigs are cheaper and flawless.
They make the factory ones anyways

 

[shootsacanon]

Nice write-up and great comparison pic. Thanks Cadcom