Failing to see the correlation.In this "possession of stolen property" case, the Court approves of the prosecution's argument that the lack of a bill of sale or receipt for a commercial icemaker is allowed to be used in court to help prove the criminal intent of the accused-- it's part of the suspicious circumstances of the deal.
(of course there were several things suspicious here, some we all agree would be even more incriminating than the seller not writing out a bill of sale or receipt. But that was one bit of evidence the State could and did use to get a conviction. Even though there was no law saying restaurant equipment sold between private parties had to be done with some written record or receipt.)
United States v. Williams, 194 F.2d 72 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read United States v. Williams, 194 F.2d 72, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
The lack of bos in this was simply an additional nail in the coffin. Providing one would have changed nothing in this over 7 decade old case.