-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
So the AK-47 is pre-historic and outdated for battle?
- Thread starter CCW
- Start date
Truth.Yeah, yeah.If I need to accurately relieve a target at 300 yards, I will use a .308 with an optic. The .223 at 300 yards is for groundhogs.
Do you even understand the term "civilian battle rifle"? I don't know one single professional that trains at even 150 yards with a civilian grade battle rifle, much less 300. Ya ever think there might be a reason behind that?
The Ak-47 is a simple crude weapon. things that are simple , last the longest. That is why the AK-47 will be seen on every battlefield until they come out the plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.
Yeah, yeah.
Do you even understand the term "civilian battle rifle"? I don't know one single professional that trains at even 150 yards with a civilian grade battle rifle, much less 300. Ya ever think there might be a reason behind that?
Youre right. Because even though they might not train for it doesnt mean it isnt a potential scenario. Burying an ak only to dig it up and have it function is a scenario that is real during a combat situation amirite?
How about you keep your Bryco in the box and I will continue to bury my AK's. Fair?
Russia uses the AK-74. I've used both and was issued the AR for years. There's nothing I can do with the AK I can't do with the AR but I can't hit you at 500 yds with iron sights with the AK but I'll drop you at that range with the AR or other rifles using iron sights.
I grew out of my caveman stage a long time ago.
I grew out of my caveman stage a long time ago.
Last edited:
Mehhhh..........AK47, AK74......
Still an AK.
Still an AK.
