I'm looking at a bike that was salvaged due to a bent subframe and damage to the engine case. The case and subframe were replaced with new ones. The bike sat for an extended period of time (several years) without being ridden.
So the $64k question is, would it be worth it if I can get it for next to nothing, or too much of a headache and just avoid it all together?
So the $64k question is, would it be worth it if I can get it for next to nothing, or too much of a headache and just avoid it all together?
They wrote him a check for replacement. Then, they sold him the now 'totaled', but completely rideable as all damage was cosmetic, bike for next to nothing. He bought a new bike, fixed the old one, sold it with salvage title (and documented repairs) and pocketed SEVERAL thousand dollars. He ran the scenario over and over with them as it made no sense to him (and to be honest he was annoyed that they would waste money that way) but they insisted. Sorry for tanent but 'salvage' may not always mean what you think it means. Sounds like you have a different history.
