- Joined
- Oct 19, 2016
- Messages
- 7,076
- Reaction score
- 4,708
Negative. LolYea. But did you xray one yet ?![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Negative. LolYea. But did you xray one yet ?![]()
They can write about it all they want. There are obviously ways to test what they claim.
Would like to see a guntuber run through the list and give honest feedback.
I don't think it does at all. You have to poke around but they are there. You can generally tell when it's sponsored or very biased.These two statements contradict each other
A gun tuber giving honest feedback about the umbrella companies paying them probably isn’t so honest, and definitely isn’t a quality test of performance
I’m going to agree to disagree on this one.I don't think it does at all. You have to poke around but they are there. You can generally tell when it's sponsored or very biased.
That's why I sport a 6in. long slide 1911 in 10 mil. You gotta love em!40 with a 115 at 1400 seems pretty good.
10mm at 1700 with same boolot.
I propose the same question. What gives?Just wondering why no agencies adopt these bullets yet? If they achieve better results with lower recoil and no lead ( environmentally friendly) you’d think big agencies especially federal would eat this up? Yet most agencies stick with federal and hornady ammo?
When it comes to fed agencies it comes down to contracts...like everything else, it's all about the money.I propose the same question. What gives?