• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Universal Background Checks? Yes or No? Ideas?

rebel1022

Bear Icon Supporter
ODT Junkie!
40   0
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
1,841
Reaction score
178
Location
Cleveland, GA
First I want everyone to know I love my second amendment rights and do what I can to make sure they are protected. I see many people that believe that universal background checks are not a good idea or that they impede on our second amendment rights. I don't see it that way and I also do not believe that it will put us any closer to a national gun registry. I am 100% AGAINST a national gun registry! I don not want any government officials knowing what I do and do not have or why I should have it.

A few years back I owned a small used car lot in Hollister, FL a little town in the middle of nowhere. One part of the paperwork process included in selling a car was a small form for the Department of Homeland Security, this form was added to the sales packet after the 911 TERRORIST, some people don't like to say that word, attacks. This paper checked all future buyers names against a national database of know terrorist affiliations or police wanted list. It was required by law to run the name of anyone buying a car. All you got when you ran the name was either a HIT, gave you a phone number to call to report said person, or a "no name found". That's all. No personal information was shared and the database doesn't record your input either.

Now I know many of you on the ODT have made the continuous decision NOT to sell a firearm to someone. I know I have myself, either from a gut feeling or just the appearance and actions of some people. I like to consider myself a responsible gun owner and trader and do not want any guns that I sell or trade ending up it the wrong hands. Now we all know this is very difficult to control, a person that is not a criminal right now could end up one given the right circumstances, but wouldn't you like a free way to check out the people your selling or trading to? Wouldn't it be nice to enter a name and birthday and get a simple yes or no answer?

I sit back everyday and get upset listening to these damn fool politicians trying to tell us what the best way to curb gun violence is! These guys have no idea what to do. All they have done is cripple the law abiding gun owners and dealers in our country. Every time they enter in new legislation it is against us, the FFL dealers, and all RESPONSIBLE gun owners. We are not the problem. They are attacking this issue from the wrong side. Weapons bans and mag capacity limits and stiffer background check laws for FFL's are not going to stop the Columbines or Sandy Hooks. People will kill by whatever means they can. They will still be able to get their hands on the weapons to do this regardless of any newly enacted assault weapons ban. Find a solution that works! Give us the power to stop weapons from getting into the wrong hands. No criminal goes to a FFL dealer to buy a gun. They go to people like us, the private owners, to buy them.

I think we could make a difference in cutting down the number of guns out there in the wrong hands. I am in no way saying that we will stop all criminals from getting guns or that we can stop another mass killing, but I do not believe anyone or any laws can do that. What I am saying is give us the means to know who we sell to and we can help to stop them. What are the opinions of my fellow ODT members on this issue and what advice would you have for our elected, a*^, sorry...leaders. Please don't respond with NOTHING, or we don't need anything, because that is not going to help us at all.
 
So you want a carfax like system that could be accessed by the general public for any reason at all to confirm whether the potential buyer is a lemon?

Would you impose a requirement that every seller gain confirmation from the system prior to completion of the sale? If so, then wouldn't the firearm in theory become registered/associated with the seller?
 
Last edited:
To enforce universal background checks, they would need universal gun registration. That doesn't sit well with me. Confiscation is just one"violent act" and a bill away. No thanks. Criminals will still obtain guns. I would venture to guess that the number of stolen guns would probably increase, but who knows.

In summation, this idea is very anti 2a
 
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." - 2nd Amendment.

Not sure what part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is so damn difficult for people to understand.
 
Speaking from a personal law enforcement perspective, universal background checks will have zero impact on criminals, that is why they are criminals, they DO NOT obey the law, hence the term criminal...
 
Ahh why not..come to think of it ill just go ahead and build a small smeltry in my back yard and throw the one revolver I own in it in the name of efficiency.

Fail

All kidding aside, any infringement on the 2nd erodes the Constitution as a whole in my book..then why stop with just the Second..So we end up putting a nice crack in the foundation of America with a precedent set for it to grow..... and criminals still get thier guns. Bad deal bad mojo
 
I cannot support any limitations or regulations on the keeping and bearing of arms.

When the government can master the art of keeping banned substances out of the hands of criminals, we can talk about keeping guns out of their hands.
 
Back
Top Bottom