This is sort of an extension of the discussion on hitting a bystander, and the often discussed subject of the use of deadly force in the defense of others.
Some ODT say that they have no problem using deadly force defending others, and others say that only in defense of themselves or family.
Read http://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...in-babies-won-charged/1ABiox3No3aQBRWQHxIzCM/ and think about what you would do.
Points to consider:
1. Freeman (the shooter) did not "stand his ground", he interjected himself into a matter in someone else house. He "moved to" the threat.
2. There was absolutely no threat to the shooter.
3. The forcible felony that justified the shooting posed no threat at all to Freeman (the shooter), his family, or anyone with whom he was was personally involved.
4. We don't know what risks were posed for the infants or their mother, but I think it is safe to assume it was an extremely close quarters shooting.
5. Would you respond with your gun to a scene you only knew from a hysterical 12 year old?
Some ODT say that they have no problem using deadly force defending others, and others say that only in defense of themselves or family.
Read http://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...in-babies-won-charged/1ABiox3No3aQBRWQHxIzCM/ and think about what you would do.
Points to consider:
1. Freeman (the shooter) did not "stand his ground", he interjected himself into a matter in someone else house. He "moved to" the threat.
2. There was absolutely no threat to the shooter.
3. The forcible felony that justified the shooting posed no threat at all to Freeman (the shooter), his family, or anyone with whom he was was personally involved.
4. We don't know what risks were posed for the infants or their mother, but I think it is safe to assume it was an extremely close quarters shooting.
5. Would you respond with your gun to a scene you only knew from a hysterical 12 year old?