• ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info

Which one of

Fly what you want to fly. Have a good day.
0Ih8x.gif
 
We had a young cat show up several years back.
Since he was small, gray, wanted to fight other
cats and even dogs we called him J.R., short for
Johnny Reb. Was that wrong?
The folks that want to take offense at the stars and
bars have their own agenda. Haven't ever heard anyone
mention or acknowledge the fact that w/o slavery at that
time period in our history their ancestors wouldn't have
ever met, those particular offspring wouldn't have been
born which means none of the current generations would
exist either. Guess they forgot about that aspect.
Now back to the important stuff, like tires.
Just have to decide whether you want recaps or radials
 
That GIF is kinda funny gonna use that later but no I'm just tired of trying to convince people they are worshipping a false narrative. People are too set in their ways. If this were a PSYOP mission I'd call in the rangers and ODA and say I give up these folks are hopeless now go do your thing.

I still haven't tried blasting loud music yet though. Let me put on Britney for them. :EVIL:

You really gotta know your target audience. ;)

 
I'm sure you know Democrats used to be Republicans and vice versa. So the flag still represents who it was meant too.
Nah brother that is BS they teach now in schools and colleges to try to rewrite history. Dems and repubs have never changed roles.
 
Nah brother that is BS they teach now in schools and colleges to try to rewrite history. Dems and repubs have never changed roles.

Feel free to read up on it.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed those measures.

After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for Black Americans and advanced social justice. And again, Democrats largely opposed these apparent expansions of federal power. The transition occurred at the turn of the 20th century, when a highly influential Democrat named William Jennings Bryan blurred party lines by emphasizing the government's role in ensuring social justice through expansions of federal power (traditionally, a Republican stance).

Democrats seized upon a way of ingratiating themselves to western voters: Republican federal expansions in the 1860s and 1870s had turned out favorable to big businesses based in the northeast, such as banks, railroads and manufacturers, while small-time farmers like those who had gone west received very little. Both parties tried to exploit the discontent this generated, by promising the little guy some of the federal help that had previously gone to the business sector. From this point on, Democrats stuck with this stance — favoring federally funded social programs and benefits — while Republicans were gradually driven to the counterposition of hands-off government..

From a business perspective, the loyalties of the parties did not really switch. Although the rhetoric and policies of the parties did switch places. Which is to say, the Republicans remain the party of bigger businesses. In other words, earlier on, businesses needed things that only a bigger government could provide, such as infrastructure development, a currency and tariffs. Once these things were in place, a small, hands-off government became better for business. So the 2 parties did in fact switch stances.
 
Feel free to read up on it.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed those measures.

After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for Black Americans and advanced social justice. And again, Democrats largely opposed these apparent expansions of federal power. The transition occurred at the turn of the 20th century, when a highly influential Democrat named William Jennings Bryan blurred party lines by emphasizing the government's role in ensuring social justice through expansions of federal power (traditionally, a Republican stance).

Democrats seized upon a way of ingratiating themselves to western voters: Republican federal expansions in the 1860s and 1870s had turned out favorable to big businesses based in the northeast, such as banks, railroads and manufacturers, while small-time farmers like those who had gone west received very little. Both parties tried to exploit the discontent this generated, by promising the little guy some of the federal help that had previously gone to the business sector. From this point on, Democrats stuck with this stance — favoring federally funded social programs and benefits — while Republicans were gradually driven to the counterposition of hands-off government..

From a business perspective, the loyalties of the parties did not really switch. Although the rhetoric and policies of the parties did switch places. Which is to say, the Republicans remain the party of bigger businesses. In other words, earlier on, businesses needed things that only a bigger government could provide, such as infrastructure development, a currency and tariffs. Once these things were in place, a small, hands-off government became better for business. So the 2 parties did in fact switch stances.
During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff.

Why did the Democratic and Republican parties switch ...

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/why-did-the-democratic-and-republican-parties-switch-platforms/ar-BB1aCBEF

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/why-did-the-democratic-and-republican-parti…

I'll take a hard pass on that if this is where you get your history.

Looks like you have fallen for liberal talking points. By your copy and paste history lesson.

 
Back
Top Bottom