A lot of “if’s”in your post.... I would file this under pure speculation...
-
ODT Gun Show & Swap Meet - May 4, 2024! - Click here for info
...
- Thread starter Nautibodi
- Start date
- Status
A lot of “if’s”in your post.... I would file this under pure speculation...
The problem with our side is that we always play defense.
This is yet another in a very long line of leftist mass shooters, and killers in general. That is the story here, but we, ie. our so-called leaders, are too skeered of the actual truth.
Even though they are infringement, there is one good thing about carry licenses. Show me the "long" list of firearms license carriers that commit these types of crimes...
This is yet another in a very long line of leftist mass shooters, and killers in general. That is the story here, but we, ie. our so-called leaders, are too skeered of the actual truth.
Even though they are infringement, there is one good thing about carry licenses. Show me the "long" list of firearms license carriers that commit these types of crimes...
"Grandfathered"? Why? That boat sailed away with the Bumpstock Ban! No need for that anymore!
Sounds like you're talking about George H. W.! Same reason we got Clinton!
Admitted on both counts. That's all we have right now. There's no facts about how the suppressor was actually used, or if it was legal or homemade or anything else.
In fact the only thing we do have as fact is Trump's comments to look into a suppressor ban, made on live TV in front of a major audience. The first comment about him not liking them didn't worry me. But that second one means he'll have to actually make a decision, and that worries me a lot.
I here ya, he was looking into repealing Obama Care, and something about a Wall too..
And we'll probably never get those facts unless it is leaked. Although I have no clue why they can't say if it's illegal because if it's illegal, then it doesn't fall under any federal registration and tax laws.
"We are not able to disclose to the public, or even to the local police department, whether the silencer has been registered or has not been registered or was lawfully possessed or was not lawfully possessed," Boyer told the Free Beacon. "There's no exception written into the statute that would allow disclosure even if the individual is deceased."
Boyer explained this was due to the fact that the National Firearms Act, which heavily regulates silencers, machineguns, and some other firearms, falls under federal tax law and the registration records contained within it are protected from public disclosure the same way other tax documents, like tax returns, are protected. Boyer said he did not know if the silencer recovered in Virginia Beach was homemade.
Wow, that's interesting... I was wondering if the MSM reporters simply didn't know that illegal suppressors were a thing or what to ask.
So the Dems want Trump's old tax returns, but can't even show a picture of the suppressor used in a mass killing? Sounds like BS to me.
So the Dems want Trump's old tax returns, but can't even show a picture of the suppressor used in a mass killing? Sounds like BS to me.
oh, so some more lying ass bull**** to fit the narrative,let me get this sky off of me.
George h w wasn't third party.... Did you read my post or just scan it over and reply? I'm saying if folks voted on principle maybe we wouldn't have the ''lesser" of two evils bull we deal with now. Also George HW is an anti just like Clinton, convince me otherwise
- Status
