the tiger looks like it might be after the elephant because its claw lands on the elephants head, you shouldn't sit on an animals food supplyI'm gonna get a tiger and put it on a leash. He will be my baby boy and no he ain't never hurt nobody.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the tiger looks like it might be after the elephant because its claw lands on the elephants head, you shouldn't sit on an animals food supplyI'm gonna get a tiger and put it on a leash. He will be my baby boy and no he ain't never hurt nobody.
All that was missing was your pretentious response telling us how you know exactly how theses threads go. The circle is completelol at these threads. Only had to read the first and last page to know it went the same way they always go.
APBT... "the canines of peace".
But no, the ones that killed the girl certainly do not appear to be purebred anything. Can't imagine a much more horrible way to go.
lol at these threads. Only had to read the first and last page to know it went the same way they always go.
APBT... "the canines of peace".
But no, the ones that killed the girl certainly do not appear to be purebred anything. Can't imagine a much more horrible way to go.
And this is what the anti pitbull guys looks like when they post colorful charts from "mom's demand action" type websites.My biggest takeaway from this thread is that pit defenders sound (at least to me) like what many of us sound like to anti-gun people. "IT'S NOT THE ________, IT'S THE OWNER!!" Not trying to fan the flames, just saying that's what this sounds like and we could probably all improve our reasoning/debating/persuasion skills (me included, for sure) if we're going to change anyone's mind on the matter.
My biggest takeaway from this thread is that pit defenders sound (at least to me) like what many of us sound like to anti-gun people. "IT'S NOT THE ________, IT'S THE OWNER!!" Not trying to fan the flames, just saying that's what this sounds like and we could probably all improve our reasoning/debating/persuasion skills (me included, for sure) if we're going to change anyone's mind on the matter.
No, your inevitable belly aching response to any counter view NOW makes the circle complete. Merry Christmas to you as wellAll that was missing was your pretentious response telling us how you know exactly how theses threads go. The circle is complete
Merry Christmas everyone!
Fat Albert's last Christmas two years ago, unfortunately cancer got him before he could maul any children
View attachment 1437759
I'm happy to defend inanimate objects protected by the bill of rights. Its a shame they even need it.My biggest takeaway from this thread is that pit defenders sound (at least to me) like what many of us sound like to anti-gun people. "IT'S NOT THE ________, IT'S THE OWNER!!" Not trying to fan the flames, just saying that's what this sounds like and we could probably all improve our reasoning/debating/persuasion skills (me included, for sure) if we're going to change anyone's mind on the matter.
I'm happy to defend inanimate objects protected by the bill of rights. Its a shame they even need it.
Do your reasearch and do diligence, be responsible reallyMy biggest takeaway from this thread is that pit defenders sound (at least to me) like what many of us sound like to anti-gun people. "IT'S NOT THE ________, IT'S THE OWNER!!" Not trying to fan the flames, just saying that's what this sounds like and we could probably all improve our reasoning/debating/persuasion skills (me included, for sure) if we're going to change anyone's mind on the matter.