My theory is this was a go fund me scam. Get in news with story of her being kidnapped after trying to save a baby and then become a go fund me millionaire within a few news cycles.
Through her attorney, she most certainly did through contradicting the false “facts“ she previously gave to police. But I agree “she“ did admit anything; her attorney did in a statement on her behalf to the police:
“Russell's attorney, Emery Anthony, emailed a statement to the Hoover Police...
What does her involvement matter? Two armed cop killers are inside her home shooting at police and putting innocent civilians in the neighboring homes at risk of taking a stray bullet. Her scumbag son is the only one who should feel bad about her house. Heck, she even refused to tell cops how...
2 1/2 years? Lol. I’ve been hearing it for 15-20 years. It’s getting to the point that the preppers of yesterday need to start replacing their 20 year shelf life food. The new term is the “great reset”. Sigh.
There has always been a distinction between minors and adults in constitutional law. 1st amendment is best example. Free speech is different for children. And the court would treat 2nd amendment the same. By yiur reasoning, the congress could also say you have to be 21 to votes. Sorry, but...
Yes, but a “law“ passed by Congress cannot entirely remove the 2nd amendment for adults age 18-21, just as a “law” passed by Congress couldn't say the 1st amnemdnent does not apply to 18-21. That doesn’t mean they won’t try to pass it, but if they do, it will eventually get to the Supreme...
yeah. It does and it should. Drug dealers should get their crap seized when used in the commission of their drug enterprise. I’m still not seeing the problem. Drug runners get their boats seizes. Drug dealers on the street get their cars seized. Drug houses get seized and sold or...
Drug dealers and other criminals have assets seized all the time used in the commission of a felony…cars, houses, computers, etc., . This isn’t new and not sure what the big deal is.
each case will turn on the facts of its own case. Significant thing in this case was allowing unlimited people to attend certain events and places but limiting religious participants. There is a lot more to it than that, but point is that the specific facts of each case would control...
Roberts is a PoS if there was any doubt that he is officially a member of the liberal wing of the court, this should eliminate that doubt. Thank God trump got to replace Ginsburg with an actual conservative justice.
I read the complete statement. It is pretty clear. It allows the seizure of private property including guns, ammo, and "anything" else needed for the national guard to do its job. If that is okay with you because some state law "allows" it, then you and I are just two very different people.
What about the following statement leads you to believe that the state has NOT issued an order allowing state officials to come take your stuff that you may need in the aftermath of a disaster?
"The order allows the Adjutant General of the Virgin Islands to seize private property they believe...
If someone comes to my house to take any of my supplies after a disaster (water, food, guns, ammo....anything), I believe that is called LOOTING -- regardless of whether they do it under power of state law.