"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
That's all I need to read.
Just a few decades ago and beyond, loaded and ready to use guns were openly hanging on bedposts, over fireplaces, and standing next to the exits. Yet, somehow, kids were not shooting each other at any alarming rate. Which leads me to believe guns are not the problem, poor parenting is.
As one of the good guys, you have to understand why, as a group, teachers get ripped bad here. It's not only about gun beliefs, but the political correctness, revisionist history, the lack of the three R's being taught in lieu of social engineering and a myriad of other idiocies being...
Good to hear...............and THANK YOU! But I gotta ask, how do you surround yourself with bedwetting progressives all day and not put a bullet in your own head? :hail:
The Constitution already says we have the right to carry, it's unconstitutional laws that say we don't. No need to expand anything, just repeal the unconstitutional laws. Nonetheless, the overwhelming majority of educators today are far-left anti-gun and I seriously doubt they would make a good...
Whatever we are doing as a society is not in the right direction. When I went to school there were no guards, the doors and windows were left wide open, anyone could walk right in, and no one was being harmed at school. In addition, boys carried pocket knives, played with cap guns during recess...
I have no doubt RFID chips will be mandatorily implanted into newborns in the not too distant future under the guise of child safety. In this context, the requiring of gun bracelets isn't that silly.
That has been revised to "take your double barrel shotgun out to the back porch and fire two shots into the air to scare off an intruder". Compliments of Joe Biden.
Thanks. On the other hand, perhaps allowing a few classes to the homies would reduce stray bullets hitting infants sleeping in their crib. Shooting a nine sideways above your shoulder may look hip, but it's very dangerous to bystanders.
I don't understand the Kennesaw Airport reference.
As for the bold, I know how they'll use it, and I for one will not willingly contribute to the cause just so I can go to play ninja with the local sheriff. Once again, thanks, but no thanks.
For who, them? And I quote from the form; "You must be at least 18 years of age and give consent (signature must be witnessed) for a background check as part of the application process."
Probably a Trojan Horse method to see who owns guns and check on their background under the guise of "we are from the government and we are here to help". Thanks, but no thanks.