Hasn’t he ran for most of them the last 10-15 years? Don’t think they get far but he’s ran on a couple of tickets now, hasn’t he?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hasn’t he ran for most of them the last 10-15 years? Don’t think they get far but he’s ran on a couple of tickets now, hasn’t he?
If I had as much money as him ain’t no damn way I’d waste my time running for president.
Looking back I see he’s just talked about it a lot. Kinda like trump without the personality.I don’t believe he has run before. I think he may run as a Moderate though just on the premise of everyone right now supports and endorses “Medacare for All”. According to most of the idiots on that stage are all about making the 1% pay for it.
Bloomberg is the 2nd or 3rd richest man in the US. I don’t think he will want to screw himself over
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You actually think that sorry ass mofo would actually be able to holt a candle to Trump and even get any headway?
Please tell me you would vote for him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Vote for him? %&^%& No!
But he has $52 billion dollars to sink into an election. It cost him a billion dollars to run for his last term as mayor of NYC. Do you think he'll spend LESS to be POTUS?
He also OWNS the media. His gun control junkets have been taking media types out for 'how to write about gun violence' junkets for decades. He's got "Mom's Demand..." groups in every state that could flipped over to campaign HQs in a heartbeat.
He's sponsored the Dems throughout this entire campaign (why do you think that 'gun control' was such a big issue?) and he could single-handedly float the DNC for years with his money.
So yes, he could 'hold a candle' to Trump with any group except gun owners, and even there he would have plenty of traction among the 'he ain't coming for my hunting rifle' types. Honestly his stance against Big Gulps will hurt him more than his anti-gun agenda with 80% of the voting population.
I believe Americans are smarter than voting for a guy who policies have consistently “failed” housing, homeless, 2A policies as well as not supporting the LEO’s within his state and all the decisive rhetoric he touts on a daily basis..
He may have his own $$ to get him in however there is zero chance in my opinion he will get to play with the big kids, (big kids)is used loosely in this context.
Maybe I’m off my rocker, IDK. I don’t see anyone overtaking him on Election Day. I just don’t see it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hope you're right. I'd love nothing more than to see him spend $10-20 billion on an election and still lose.
That being said, he owns so much media anything bad will get buried in a heartbeat, and 99% of America has no idea of what he did as mayor. His biggest national media flop came from him trying to ban Big Gulps. If you ask most people that's the biggest negative he has.
Probably 80% of people in the US really don't care about gun control one way or the other, it's not hot-button issue except for the minority dedicated to the pro and anti sides.
It'll be interesting to see what Guillinani can bring to bear against his successor. He's got a lot more credibility as the 'mayor of 9/11', but the press is all over him these days as well.
Strangely I do have faith in Trump getting the better of him, but with his literal ownership of the media I have limited faith that it will matter. Even Fox is based in NYC, and he owns that town even today.
This could suddenly go from being a Trump landslide (my original feeling) to a disaster. I guess we'll have to see if he's serious, or just getting a warm-up for 2024. Hopefully he is simply testing the waters, but at his age I'm thinking he wants to be POTUS now so he'll still be alive for a second term.