I thought GA law had something about a 'tumultuous entry', or am I thinking about someplace else?
Anyways, Self defense law is pretty much the same inside and outside your house. You must be in reasonable fear of death or grave bodily injury, and the attacker must have the Ability and Opportunity to place your life in Jeopardy.
Castle law is sort of a shortcut for some of that. It basically says that a violent entry into a dwelling is enough to prove Jeopardy and Opportunity. After all, they are in your home with you (Opportunity) and their violent entry indicates violent intent (Jeopardy).
Of course Ability still comes into play. If you are a 250lb linebacker, and your neighbors 12 year-old daughter kicks in your screen door because you didn't pay for your Girl Scout cookies, you're going to spend a long time behind bars if you shoot her.
Once you are outside your dwelling though, the 'leg up' in proving self-defense castle doctrine gives you goes away. Sort of. Maybe.
After all, someone simply walking up your driveway is hardly a violent entry. Standing on a open porch would be the same. But say it was a screened-in porch and they kicked in the door?
That's why good defense lawyers get paid so much. I'm not one so don't take any of this as anything more than me thinking out loud though.
It is pleasure to see people that invest time into understanding the law.
What you are referring to is known as the "reasonable man doctrine."
Ability, opportunity, & jeopardy must be present to justify use of deadly force.
I can't agree with all that you stated but you're on the right track to research it.
While I'm not an attorney we have had 5 different people sentenced by local judges as part of their probation to take the claaseoom part of our class where we discuss these laws thoroughly.
It is critical to learn these laws.
Last edited:
"emotionally" WTF

