GA Supreme Court-Stephens (2025)

[BEREZKA]

Most on here refuse to sell a handgun to anyone under 21 anyway. Why show any concern whether or not they can carry it when you refuse to sell it to them anyway? It is kind of like saying it is bad for the state to violate there rights but ok if I do it.

Because the states liability is backed by taxpayers footing court costs.

 

[Alpha5717]

Some people who willing submit to state permitting concerned about constitutional carry….ironic

Some, but not all. The earliest court decisions held that the Right is pre-existing, natural, inherent, God given, unalienable, absolute and above the law making power. The state does not "permit" me; the state can only guarantee my Rights.

 

[Alpha5717]

No, you keep the rights the state lets you have.

Were you asleep during covid? How may people have Donny held accountable since then? None.

Buddy if people gave a damn about freedumb they wouldnt of flooded the country with immigrants since the 60's, let the patriot act pass, ect.

Pardon my ignorance, but what does all that mean?

 

[CQB27]

Some, but not all. The earliest court decisions held that the Right is pre-existing, natural, inherent, God given, unalienable, absolute and above the law making power. The state does not "permit" me; the state can only guarantee my Rights.

Do you have a carry permit payed to and issued by the state?

 

[Alpha5717]

Do you have a carry permit payed to and issued by the state?

Georgia doesn't require a permit. This is the way things used to be:

“ The right of the people to bear arms shall not he infringed.” The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such, merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree ; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled under foot by Charles I. and his two wicked sons and successors, reestablished by the revolution of 1688, conveyed to this land of liberty by the colonists, and finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna Charla l And Lexington, Concord, Camden, River Raisin, Sandusky, and the laurel-crowned field of New Orleans, plead eloquently for this interpretation !' Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243 (1846)

BTW, that was the first time a case was reversed on Second Amendment grounds.

 

[wildbill1973z28]

Yeah like all rights. This isnt a free country at all.

Does any of this suprise anyone? Look at how much black on black gun crime this state has and tell me we have any chance of keeping gunnrights in the future

Just make sure you have one or two hid away