Can't comment on the specifics of the M&P 40, but guns with "internal" safeties generally rely on the positive mechanical engagement of two surfaces with a specific geometry, which, in theory, can't disengage from one another without a manual action (trigger pull). Sometimes it's a blocking type engagement, e.g., a mechanically activated structure that is in the path of the firing pin, allowing it no way to get to the primer without a trigger pull.
A common passive safety device found on modern revolvers and some other types of (usually manual operated) firearms: Transfer bars. The transfer bar is moved into the path of the hammer with a full trigger pull. Without that bar in place, the hammer can't reach the firing pin. It needs the transfer bar to transfer its energy to firing pin.
These are ALL mechanical systems, involving small parts and sometimes, small springs. And operating in a dirty environment (burnt gunpowder, primer debris, lead dust, etc.) Which means they are all susceptible to failure from wear, debris accumulation, and in some cases, poor design and/or manufacturing tolerances that allow for failure based on unanticipated on unexpected modes.
A common passive safety device found on modern revolvers and some other types of (usually manual operated) firearms: Transfer bars. The transfer bar is moved into the path of the hammer with a full trigger pull. Without that bar in place, the hammer can't reach the firing pin. It needs the transfer bar to transfer its energy to firing pin.
These are ALL mechanical systems, involving small parts and sometimes, small springs. And operating in a dirty environment (burnt gunpowder, primer debris, lead dust, etc.) Which means they are all susceptible to failure from wear, debris accumulation, and in some cases, poor design and/or manufacturing tolerances that allow for failure based on unanticipated on unexpected modes.
