Yet you do respond.
You suggest there is no harm in violent video games inciting anyone to do anything correct? That IS the entire basis for your disagreement correct? I asked if you felt the same about viewing (not the creation of) child porn. If a video game (which actually requires active participation in simulated violence) can't prompt action, then presumably you think it shouldn't be illegal to own and view child porn since no one is prompted to do anything illegal and there is no 'harm' in doing so, right?
No, I think the pictures you describe are illegal because it is the product of an illegal activity. I did not say the pictures do not cause harm. Of course they do. Children were harmed in the production of those pictures. The financial part of the business encourages more children to be harmed for future sales of the product. So yes, it is teribly harmful on many levels. However, the supreme court has previoulsy ruled that man-made renderings of such acts cannot be made illegal because they are fictional and did not involve actual children. Disgusting, but not illegal. So yes, I still fail to see what this has to do with your argument that violent video games are part of the cause of mass shootings.
I think viewing violent video games does not cause people to kill. That is my position. So are you saying that viewing the pictures you describe causes the viewers to go commit a subsequent crime? Are you saying viewing gay porn could make someone gay? I am truly lost with your analogy.
Maybe possessing and viewing snuff films is an easier analogy for you? You can't pick and choose what logic you use to suit your preconceived ideas.
Really? You dont see the actual reason snuff films are illegal? Killing people for a movie to sell? Okay. Moving on. But just as a reminder to the above point, fake snuff films exist and are legal and I put forth the position that they dont cause people to go out and kill. I have seen Natural born Killers and lots of other Hollywood movies filled with non-stop random thrill kills (make believe of course), and I have yet to kill a soul as a result. So have Billions of other people.
You cant highlight illegal content that is illegal because of the ACTUAL harm being carried out in that content and try to compare it to cartoons shooting other cartoons. Well, I guess you can (and did), but I still think your analogies to that content are way off target.