Hey all. I was looking at this http://www.midwayusa.com/product/951250/del-ton-ar-15-dissipator-a3-flat-top-upper-assembly-556x45mm-nato-1-in-9-twist-16-rifle-length-heavy-contour-barrel-chrome-moly-matte-with-a2-handguard-flash-hider and then I found this comment from Del-Ton's blog.
Any comments on any issues this might have especially from those that may have experience?
Thank you!
Currently at DTI, our dissipator style of AR-15 rifle (a 16â barrel with a rifle length gas system) has a true rifle length gas system. Many other manufacturers build this style of AR-15 with a mid-length gas system under the handguards using a low profile gas block; a front sight base (that does not serve as a gas block) is then installed at the typical ârifle-lengthâ location. The main advantage of this style would be the very long sight radius. Possible negative aspects include the weapon being a bit âmuzzle heavyâ and limitations in ammunition selection (see next paragraph).
Many things can affect the cycling and reliable operation of an AR-15. Multiple variations from the original design have created real benefits for some applications. However, these variations may require additional modifications...or they may create new limitations. Having a mid-length gas system on a 14.5â or shorter barrel, or a rifle length gas system on a 16â barrel (true dissipator) can necessitate an ammunition selection that produces higher pressures. This is due to the distance for the gas pressure required for cycling to travel before most of it escapes out of the muzzle behind the projectile. Some of the less expensive ammunition may use lower quality gunpowder that burns inconsistently; this can result in gas pressure that is inadequate for proper cycling. The weight of the bolt carrier and buffer also play an important role in the cycling of a weapon, so the right combination is necessary for peak performance.
Many things can affect the cycling and reliable operation of an AR-15. Multiple variations from the original design have created real benefits for some applications. However, these variations may require additional modifications...or they may create new limitations. Having a mid-length gas system on a 14.5â or shorter barrel, or a rifle length gas system on a 16â barrel (true dissipator) can necessitate an ammunition selection that produces higher pressures. This is due to the distance for the gas pressure required for cycling to travel before most of it escapes out of the muzzle behind the projectile. Some of the less expensive ammunition may use lower quality gunpowder that burns inconsistently; this can result in gas pressure that is inadequate for proper cycling. The weight of the bolt carrier and buffer also play an important role in the cycling of a weapon, so the right combination is necessary for peak performance.
Any comments on any issues this might have especially from those that may have experience?
Thank you!