The claim is that the building fell into it's own footprint which it didn't and that it fell at free fall speed which it didn't and the photos and videos they show as proof that it fell in it's own footprint and the video they posted to show it fell at free fall speed both show that their claims...
If the street the building fell into was within the footprint. If not then the building did not fall within it's footprint as claimed. The street was not within the footprint so the claim is false.
As for the supposed free fall speed. The video they use to show this clearly shows a part on the...
"Building 7 was destroyed in the manner of a classic implosion, falling suddenly, symmetrically, and in absolute free fall into its own footprint."
The man who said this must not have actually watched the video of the building collapse that they are using as proof of this claim.
I'd say something like a 4 or 5 but I don't have experience doing that math..
According to what I am finding the aircraft impacts alone registered 0.9 and 0.7. Apparently the tower collapses registered as a 2.1 and a 2.3.
Since the buildings in New York are designed to handle a 4 or 4.5, "The...
When the conspiracy theory guys say stuff like those buildings fell at free fall speed I tend to point out that that is not correct.
Find a video for building 7 which allows you to see what some term the penthouse structure and you will see that structure collapse then there is a pause of a...
I haven't read the whole NIST report. IF that is what the report says then in my opinion it is wrong.
I know from my own experience with explosives that seismic events can do damage to buildings. I do not recall doing any damage to any buildings myself but I know that it does happen. The...
IF NIST failed to mention the energy released by the tower collapses then they made a huge miscalculation. Typical Govt mistake perhaps.
I haven't read the full NISTreport but that would be a HUGE mistake.
No aircraft hit building 7. It suffered 2 earthquakes I forget the magnitude but you could look that up if you wanted. It suffered damage from parts of the towers hitting it. The fire within can hardly be classified an office fire. A single column in the most vulnerable portion of the cantilever...
I did explosves work.. no one I know of would go in that building and do that.
No way the towers were pre rigged. You couldn't know the aircraft impact wouldn't disrupt the circuits. I know of know remote system that has that sort of timing capability. I believe people would have had to have...
As I understand it pull it in that instance meant pull the fire fighters.
Go speak to demolition people. I think you will find that pull it in demolition circles has nothing to do with explosives.
Building 7 didn't fall the same way. Go find a video where you can see the top of the building...
Ya gotta love this one.
How many years did it take DoD to lose this 2.3 trillion dollars?
The idiot in the video claimed in one year alone...
Care to explain how DoD could possibly lose 2.3 trillion dollars when the budget at the time would have been less than a 1/4 of that amount?
Building 7 didn't fall at free fall speed.
Go find a video of the collapse that shows the top of the structure from an angle that shows the smaller portions at the top. Time the actual fall and do the math yourself.
The truther videos where they claim building 7 fell at free fall speed do not...
That article proves nothing.
In the first place many many engineers and many people who aren't engineers can explain how the collapse of building 7 came about.
It is as simple as pointing out the building 7 was built over the top of an electrical switching station. Part of the foundation for...
If you know of any explosive engineers who will go into a burning building that is going to collapse in order to set explosives to bring it down I sure would love to drink a few with them.
Gulf of Tonkin.
Ever actually researched what actually happened without going to one of the it was a lie conspiracy sites or one of those to debunk them?
The govt ineptitude is astounding if what I found is true and my experience with the govt leads me to believe it to be so.
What I found...
Which part would you like disproved sir?
I can not prove that there are or are not govt agents doing something.
Funny thing that.
It appears that you are now claiming the guys who made the claim that the govt explanation for the collapse of the towers and WTC 7 and the incident at the...