I have the Mark II slabside with a Nikon 2x scope. It is real easy to shoot shotgun hull at 100yds. They are a pain to put back together but after a few times it does get easier.
-
If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.
.22lr Pistol Opinions
- Thread starter Leshaire
- Start date
NOPE! repeat, NOPE! get a Ruger in any of the Mark series and you will be happy that you did. no regrets...........ever! --- ....about your .22 semi auto purchase.
Ruger mkii, hate the plastic on the mkiii.
Love my Buckmark!
An all steel MKIII is a little hefty, not light. I love mine though. The 22/45 is the model with the polymer frame. It has a grip angle similar to a 1911. most 1911 grips will fit on a 22/45 as well if it has replaceable panels. Go handle them both and pick the one that feels the best to you and you will be happy.
I guess the 'non-slide action" puts a Beretta 87 out of the running, but I just have to post the one I finally found:
Either the Ruger MK series (Mk II, Mk III, 22/45) or Buck Marks would do fine. I think the Rugers are slightly more robust, but their triggers suck. I personally prefer the BM's due to their *great* factory triggers, and by the fact that it's much cheaper to swap barrels around without going through a FFL.
Either the Ruger MK series (Mk II, Mk III, 22/45) or Buck Marks would do fine. I think the Rugers are slightly more robust, but their triggers suck. I personally prefer the BM's due to their *great* factory triggers, and by the fact that it's much cheaper to swap barrels around without going through a FFL.
with those requirements all that i can think of is a ruger mark series, a browning buckmark, a beretta neos, or a sw22a
