-
ODT Gun Show this Saturday! - Click here for info and tickets!
AJC Want's Your Input on Gunz
- Thread starter mountainpass
- Start date
done
Done, didn't care for the wording on either question.
It's carefully worded to obtain the results they want. Note questions that are always or never are selective in intent and desired response. While the 2A is clear as to purpose and intent and generally not be infringed is taken to mean law abiding citizens. however, the AJC poll makes an absolute question that doesn't allow any exception.
They think the public is ignorant and they will catch a good bit of responders.
Or one can refuse to play their game but still respond.
Violent felons if released and those that who are mental ill and a threat to the public may need to be "prohibited" but with ability to restore that right if no longer considered a public threat. Law abiding citizens the second amendment does mean what it says, despite those who think contained in our bill of rights is a state's right to create an Army.
I had to LOL at this poll question. They should include if you own guns do you masturbate to gun porn as much as you would like?
They don't ask if you think the bill should be vetoed as those polls have not obtained their desired response and contradict their fear mongering.
So they word it to ignore the bill and include a portion of the bill that was included to specifically make it palatable to the uniformed masses.
Those aware of the low criminal rates of vetted permit carrying citizens vs. the rest of the public as well as those rates being lower than trained LEO know that the risk of allowing these folks to retain their weapons in public housing doesn't increase risk as determined by decades of campuses that don't criminalize it.
But the public isn't made aware of this as the media ignores it and suppresses it.
Hah, carefully selected words. Too transparent, biased fools, talk about a loaded question in order to obtain a desired response! The choices don't match the question. Don't veto HB 859 Gov. Deal.
But this is what biased liberals do to gather support damn facts, damn experience and damn the honest history of such. We would be in a much better place without them.
I attempted to submit info so a "reporter" could contact me but couldn't. I suspect you have to be a subscriber.
Yeah that's not happening, not with the current mindset and vision of those fools.
Done. I also didn't like the wording of the questions particularly the second one. I put my UGA email down we'll see if the contact me. Not sure I'm gonna give them the anti gun response they want though lol
