Another thought, gun and ammo sellers are supposed to do some level of due diligence prior to selling to customers and here we have a customer that openly admits to a mental disorder that requires him to use a dog to determine whether or not he is under attack in a public place.
Should he be purchasing guns and ammo?
Isn't this what our side of the gun control debate has been saying? We don't need gun control. We need control of people with disorders who attempt to purchase guns and ammo.
This gentleman had a big four legged sign that screamed "Don't sell me ammo!" "I have surrendered my sense of judgment to this dog!"
Have we determined exactly what the dog was for? If it was to perform services such as opening doors, turning lights on/off, fetching items, etc. because the vet was disabled then I disagree with this post.
HOWEVER, if the purpose of this dog was STRICTLY to soothe him because he would freak out whenever he left the house then yeah I absolutely agree with you, this guy has no business buying firearms. He should get therapy on our (the taxpayers) dime until he is better, but for now he's mentally unstable.