• All users have been asked to change their passwords. This is just a precaution. Thanks!
  • If you are having trouble with your password change please click here for help.

Confused on barrel length and/or overall length. Please help.

If the barrel is over 16" but the overall length is under 26" it is still subject to NFA, it might be called AOW or Firearm, not SBR. That may be where the confusion comes in. It may not be called an Short Barreled Rifle if the barrel is over 16" but it is still under the purview of the NFA. That is how I interpret it at any rate.
 
To AVOID building an SBR it's an "and" situation --your barrel length and OAL have to comply.


For the feds to bust you for breaking the law,
it's an "either / or" situation.

Either you are prosecuted because your barrel was too short,
or they prosecute you because your OAL was too short.
Each is a freestanding, independent reason to
send you to Club Fed for 10 years of butthumping
with a cellmate that looks like a linebacker for the New Orleans Saints.
 
If the barrel is over 16" but the overall length is under 26" it is still subject to NFA, it would likely be called AOW not SBR. That may be where the confusion comes in. It cannot be called an Short Barreled Rifle if the barrel is over 16" but it is still under the purview of the NFA. That is how I interpret it at any rate.

Wrong.
If it's made by modifying a rifle that had a shoulder stock, this newly configured weapon cannot be an AOW; it would be an SBR.

But if you were assembling a virgin receiver into a firearm then you could go with an AOW. It's The same cost to manufacture one, but after it's built and registered to you you can transfer it to others for just five bucks.
 
Well, if you don't know whether to trust the attorney who wrote the gun law book or some random dude posting online,
I say ignore anything that any of us say in this ODT thread and go directly to the ATF for an answer.


They actually have a frequently asked question website that is fairly easy to understand. They don't quote the exact verbiage of the law or the regulations;
they just summarize it in a way that most people can appreciate.

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/rifle-firearm-subject-nfa

Yeah sorry bout that, we have to word things in a way no one gets their feelings hurt... I expected you to post a reference just like you did and I didn't get into any trouble for it....
 
To AVOID building an SBR it's an "and" situation --your barrel length and OAL have to comply.


For the feds to bust you for breaking the law,
it's an "either / or" situation.

Either you are prosecuted because your barrel was too short,
or they prosecute you because your OAL was too short.
Each is a freestanding, independent reason to
send you to Club Fed for 10 years of butthumping
with a cellmate that looks like a linebacker for the New Orleans Saints.

Haha thanks for the analogy. No pun intended.

I guess the ol' "I swear it looks bigger than it really is" won't work in this situation.

Well I'm definitely not going to be giving more money to the government AND I will be ordering a new barrel. Anyone need a 16.5" blued threaded bull barrel for a 10/22? LOL
 
Wrong.
If it's made by modifying a rifle that had a shoulder stock, this newly configured weapon cannot be an AOW; it would be an SBR.
The only part of that statement that may be wrong is what it is called. It is still subject to NFA rules and that is the point I was trying to make.
 
Back
Top Bottom