Getting naked at TSA checkpoint is not protected free speech

[araomd]

So says the 9th circuit, but they are overruled about everything anyway (crosses fingers case goes to SCOTUS)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...challenge-to-500-fine/?utm_term=.a16af2d54b6c

 

[palmettomoon]

**** the TSA. Bunch of overpaid, goober assed, Joe Scruffy looking pedophile mooks.

 

[davis211]

**** the TSA. Bunch of overpaid, goober assed, Joe Scruffy looking pedophile mooks.

Bahahah!!! Tell us how you really feel.

 

[kuduman]

Their analysis is flawed as always-- I am a person of ordinary sensibilities, and I would INSTANTLY understand the political point he was making with those TSA SOBs. No further explanation necessary. If he'd relieved himself right there to prove he wasn't hiding anything in his bladder either-- I'd still understand, applaud, and LMFAO. As long as he didn't do it ON the TSA "professionals", which would be illegal, I'd still call it a political act and protected under the First.

That's as political as you can get.

 

[jmartinroe]

Pictures or it didn't happen.

 

[Falcon1]

Pictures or it didn't happen.

 

[emptyMAGS]

Pictures or it didn't happen.

 

[Old Patriot]

NO PICS, PLEASE NO PICS, YUCK getting sick!!!!

 

[araomd]

Pictures or it didn't happen.

 

[Kahrnut]