H&K HK45 vs Sig P227

[Willy Leadwell]

HK for me. "Brick in yo face" Is that the Glock option?

 

[dsp]

HK for me. "Brick in yo face" Is that the Glock option?

HK vs Glock would be a harder decision than HK vs Shig

 

[Big H]

I bought a USP in .45 and thought I would keep it; that is until my wife shot it. She had never shot a semi-auto and stacked 10 shots into center mass at 10 yards; the group was smaller than a pie plate. The recoil reduction in the HK made the difference and it was her gun then; I did not sleep well that night either!
I had a Sig and it is not the gun for a woman; get the HK, you will be happy and so will she.
Both guns are reliable but the HK has far less recoil was the deciding factor.

 

[Toyman]

If they made a .45 PPQ there would be no question...

^^^^ This! I have 2PPQ'S thinking about adding a third. I bought a Sig 227 SAS carry in July, traded it for an HK45 in October. No comparison the HK is undeniably more accurate and easier to shoot.

 

[Shemp]

^^^^ This! I have 2PPQ'S thinking about adding a third. I bought a Sig 227 SAS carry in July, traded it for an HK45 in October. No comparison the HK is undeniably more accurate and easier to shoot.

Interesting. I liked the Sig...seemed very well made and all but it seemed to lack that "x" factor.

 

[Willy Leadwell]

Interesting. I liked the Sig...seemed very well made and all but it seemed to lack that "x" factor.

I agree, I've owned a couple Sigs and they were/are all super reliable and consistent. But now I carry an HK and it's just got something that Sig doesn't. It looks better, it feels better. It's just more fun to own.