I've changed my mind about the Second Amendment

[Hasselhoss]

Once again we are back to the fact that the word "inalienable" is never used in the Constitution or Bill of Rights. I'm willing to bet that wasn't simply an oversight. Rights are natural but can be given up, lost or taken if you abuse that right. The standard for that decision should be a felony conviction applicable to that specific right.

 

[Hasselhoss]

I would like to add that I do not believe Laufen is actively looking to arm violent felons but is instead asking if the 2A needs to be a bit more verbose.

 

[Constitution Hour]

Nor be deprived of life,liberty or property without due process of law.

 

[captdave77]

Nor be deprived of life,liberty or property without due process of law.

A conviction is "due process of law".

 

[Constitution Hour]

Like it or not our system of juricprudence is one of majority rule, the majority of 12 in most cases.

 

[alnen]

Once again we are back to the fact that the word "inalienable" is never used in the Constitution or Bill of Rights. I'm willing to bet that wasn't simply an oversight. Rights are natural but can be given up, lost or taken if you abuse that right. The standard for that decision should be a felony conviction applicable to that specific right.

There is no such thing as abusing a right, that is a disgusting way of thinking. You can commit crimes, but "abusing a right"? No.

 

[Constitution Hour]

There is no such thing as abusing a right, that is a disgusting way of thinking. You can commit crimes, but "abusing a right"? No.

I disagree. If you use yur right to life or liberty to deny the same to others, you are abusing your right and theirs. With rights come responsibility, and consequences for your actions.

 

[Hasselhoss]

There is no such thing as abusing a right, that is a disgusting way of thinking. You can commit crimes, but "abusing a right"? No.

All attempts at responding to your post in a civil manner were met with a roadblock at your disrespectful accusation of a thought process being "disgusting". The simple fact that you pretend to not understand the semantics of the assertion is so foolish as to warrant scornful laughter. I instead choose to shake my head, wish you good tidings and move on to an intelligent retort.

 

[bearpugh]

All attempts at responding to your post in a civil manner were met with a roadblock at your disrespectful accusation of a thought process being "disgusting". The simple fact that you pretend to not understand the semantics of the assertion is so foolish as to warrant scornful laughter. I instead choose to shake my head, wish you good tidings and move on to an intelligent retort.

dang hoss. you sound like frazier crane. lol

 

[alnen]

I can see this is going nowhere. One parting word... While you stand back as other's rights get trampled, who's going to be there to help when they come for your rights?

Just process that. No need to reply, I won't be back. If it makes you feel better, have at it. Vent all you want, I'm done trying.