* Military / Law enforcement Personel *

[mkdhotrod]

jyphotog...you spend a lot of time telling everyone else that they're drones and they'll do exactly what they're told to do. You call us pussies and say that we don't stand a chance. Every thread that comes up that you post in says the same thing. I'm wondering about you bud, I really am. You wonder which door you'll kick in first and that you pretty much endorse using very stern force to get the job done. Are you really saying that you would be first in line to use explosives to disarm Americans? That's what it sounds like to me. It sounds like you think everyone else are just drones and zombies that will fall in line. All of us, except for you of course, you're different . You really have me curious as to where you stand. You are either for the 2nd, or against it. There is no "I want to keep mine, but I'll gladly follow orders and do what I'm told to take yours"..sounds a bit drone and zombie-like to me. Have fun with it, I wish you the best in your endeavors.

I'm in the same seat here, I own many guns, but I can't disobey the orders I'm given, or you'll see me in a courts' martial. If they come down from the executive branch, they aren't considered unlawful, not immoral, because although the federal G cannot prohibit all firearms because the the 2nd Amendment, but they can sure limit it. Its not a good seat to be in when the G controls your checks, retirement, and can throw you in prison.

 

[LARGO9]

Hell last week we were talking about $50.00 pmags --this week we are talking about killing each other----wonder what we will be talking about next week---are you people really listening to what you are saying about killing each other------really--time to get a grip on things----to much billy bad ass talk out there-------------------------------

 

[Inbonuscivis]

I'm in the same seat here, I own many guns, but I can't disobey the orders I'm given, or you'll see me in a courts' martial. If they come down from the executive branch, they aren't considered unlawful, not immoral, because although the federal G cannot prohibit all firearms because the the 2nd Amendment, but they can sure limit it. Its not a good seat to be in when the G controls your checks, retirement, and can throw you in prison.

Were our founding fathers not subject to the same discipline? Yet they managed to muster the courage to do what is necessary. An unlawful order is an order that goes against the oath you (And I) swore to defend....Disarming your countrymen sure as hell falls into that category to me.

 

[lilred06]

Were our founding fathers not subject to the same discipline? Yet they managed to muster the courage to do what is necessary. An unlawful order is an order that goes against the oath you (And I) swore to defend....Disarming your countrymen sure as hell falls into that category to me.

Feels good to have one on our side. Regardless of what happens I know where I stand. I'm not saying it will get to that point, nor am I saying I'm gonna go all James Yeager and pack a bag with food and ammo and have a big bloody firefight. More or less just curious as to where some of you stand. And possibly who not to do certain deals with if I can be honest. I respect you for your service, not a shred of doubt there. And I see where you're coming from, but "orders are orders" doesn't seem like a very moral code to live by.

 

[lostgeorge75]

jyphotog...maybe I missed it, but what's your MOS?

 

[Bear44]

I'm in the same seat here, I own many guns, but I can't disobey the orders I'm given, or you'll see me in a courts' martial. If they come down from the executive branch, they aren't considered unlawful, not immoral, because although the federal G cannot prohibit all firearms because the the 2nd Amendment, but they can sure limit it. Its not a good seat to be in when the G controls your checks, retirement, and can throw you in prison.

So, many here are talking about risking their life to resist an unconstitutional gun confiscation, but you are willing to kill fellow Americans to enforce that confiscation because you won't risk a CM. Got it.

Your first and foremost oath is the protect the Constitution, isn't it?

 

[mkdhotrod]

So, many here are talking about risking their life to resist an unconstitutional gun confiscation, but you are willing to kill fellow Americans to enforce that confiscation because you won't risk a CM. Got it.

Your first and foremost oath is the protect the Constitution, isn't it?

I will not kill any american under those circumstances, there are limits

 

[mkdhotrod]

And.. I highly doubt it would ever come to that.

 

[Inbonuscivis]

I will not kill any american under those circumstances, there are limits

But you will follow orders to kick the doors in and consficate should they come down from your CO? I am not bashing you brother I am just trying to wrap my head around your thought process. You say you will follow orders but won't kill americans....what happens when Haji (In this Case Mark, Mike, Hillary, or Beth) start shooting back...I would suspect you typically shoot back.

 

[Bear44]

Hell last week we were talking about $50.00 pmags --this week we are talking about killing each other----wonder what we will be talking about next week---are you people really listening to what you are saying about killing each other------really--time to get a grip on things----to much billy bad ass talk out there-------------------------------

On the other hand, if the government knows there are real people willing to fight for their rights, they are much less likely to make it necessary. I hope to hell the administration is reading these threads and all the others on other sites that are saying the same thing. They need to understand that not all of the people of this country have turned into the sheep they so much. They need to know there are still many wolves in the woods that they will need to deal with if they go to far. THAT is WHY the 2nd Amendment exists. To feed the wolves.