While a 5.56 carbine will easily outperform a PCC, I find that my Sub-2000 is useful in one regard: It is LIGHT - around 4 lbs or so. I can fold it up and tuck it between the kidney pad and bag on my ALICE pack and go for a hike. It's slim and hides well tucked in there, but is still fairly quick to get at and deploy.
If I need it I get more bullet velocity and energy, and the aforementioned 3 points of contact for accuracy.
I've always wondered: What if someone took a 9mm Sub 2000, added a .40 S&W bolt, then reamed out the chamber for 357 SIG. Would it work? Would it blow up?
Ballistics by the inch says a 16" barrel would put a 125 grain bullet at 1750 fps. Still not in "real" rifle territory, but dang.
Kel-Tec, are you listening?
If I need it I get more bullet velocity and energy, and the aforementioned 3 points of contact for accuracy.
I've always wondered: What if someone took a 9mm Sub 2000, added a .40 S&W bolt, then reamed out the chamber for 357 SIG. Would it work? Would it blow up?
Ballistics by the inch says a 16" barrel would put a 125 grain bullet at 1750 fps. Still not in "real" rifle territory, but dang.
Kel-Tec, are you listening?