• If you are having trouble changng your password please click here for help.

Revolver Carry?

Revolver for conceal carry?

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 64.3%
  • Yes, but only with a pistol backup

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • No, I'm not from the past.

    Votes: 10 14.3%
  • Tacos

    Votes: 7 10.0%
  • Yes, as a BBQ, Special event.

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Yes, as a BBQ, Special event. (Pistol backup)

    Votes: 4 5.7%

  • Total voters
    70
  • Poll closed .
The FBI study shows 95% of all shootings fire less than 3 rounds at less than 20 feet. Where an auto excels is the ability to reload faster
Key statistic that has been confirmed in other studies.

I generally carry a revolver when I am out and about. I even have an I frame in .32 that I carry sometimes. It's a tiny little thing,

Other times, a Model 39.

The advantage of nearly 100% first shot reliability is key for me.
 
A revolver is no better or worse......it's just different. They have their pros and cons.

In my experience, a comparable quality revolver that has been maintained is more reliable than a semi-auto that has been retained. When there is a "malfunction" with a revolver, it tends to be the ammo that caused it. I have seen ammo issues completely lock up a revolver, however. Lock it up to the point that you need tools to fix it.

The ammo is less critical to functioning in a revolver than it is in a pistol. In most cases, if it fits in the cylinder, then it's good to go. Same can't be said of a pistol round that fits in a magazine.

I shot Revolver in USPSA off and on for a few years. You end up figuring out what they can and can't do well.
I used to shoot a lot of PPC type competitions, many of which were restricted to "duty guns". In shooting thousands of rounds, I had FTF that was attributable to the gun, sort of. I had dicked around with the strain screw, and got a light hammer strike. When I undicked it, everything went fine thereafter.

In a match, there was usually one malfunction with the semi-autos, which included stuff like dropped magazines, and other operator errors. The top shooters would use revolvers if they had the option.

Most of the time, I was shooting my reloads, so there was plenty of opportunity for ammo issues.

I'm not arguing that one system is better than the other. I will argue that for the casual shooter, the person who isn't going to spend a lot of range time with a gun, the revolver is the better alternative due to its innate simplicity of operation, and in my mind, better point and shoot capabilities.
 
And I have worked with a few "little old ladies" who could not rack the slide on any semi-auto (the new S&W may be an exception) but using both hands could "thumb cock" a revolver. Was it near ideal? Absolutely not, but it gave them a capability they otherwise would not have had.
 
Key statistic that has been confirmed in other studies.

I generally carry a revolver when I am out and about. I even have an I frame in .32 that I carry sometimes. It's a tiny little thing,

Other times, a Model 39.

The advantage of nearly 100% first shot reliability is key for me.
The first shot reliability is important. The time to first shot is faster with a revolver because I’m starting with my hand in my pocket.
 
And I have worked with a few "little old ladies" who could not rack the slide on any semi-auto (the new S&W may be an exception) but using both hands could "thumb cock" a revolver. Was it near ideal? Absolutely not, but it gave them a capability they otherwise would not have had.
Absolutely. It's the best choice for old ladies. Happy mother's day to all the revolver carriers.
 
Back
Top Bottom